The blog is no longer accessible from ‘aryanism.net’. The entire blog has been moved to a new website which will encompass myself and a couple of other Aryanists into one blog. The blog will be accessible from ‘aryanism.net’.

This move is a result of the deletion by WordPress of Aryan Sanctuary’s wordpress account since AS will also be moving to this new blog website. All of our content will be up within a couple of days!

This article is posted as a response to many genuine and sincere Aryanists (and others) who believe that our economic policies should be similar to those of currently-established powers. Although not adopting a neoliberal economic perspective, they still adopt an overly “orthodox” economic outlook for an Aryanist State.

Much of this discussion as to the economics of an Aryanist State is well-founded. Information about National Socialist Germany’s economy is scarce in comparison to the data that we have today. Furthermore, the methods used by the National Socialists are “unorthodox” in the sense that it is outside of normal economic practice for all modern economies and those running them. While it isn’t necessary to devise an economic alternative in all its details, as the situation will have changed when the chance comes to implement them, considerable effort should be made to construct a solid economic philosophy and, in this article, the means by which this philosophy will be fulfilled.

The discussion mentioned above of economics comes primarily from those who have been influenced by Anarchism or its many variations. Anarchism, in either its political or economic form, is not relevant to Aryanism. The compulsion for orthodoxy and acceptability, I think, is what drives many to anarchism as it is a revolt and not revolution. An Aryanist State must necessarily be authoritarian, both politically and economically. The age of granting rights for this or that activity, group or belief must end. The current situation we find ourselves in with an unstable geopolitical climate, environmental disaster and a demographic nightmare is a direct result of the beliefs still held by Libertarians, Anarchists, Conservatives and others. The reaction to these issues by these groups confirms this, with some downplaying the issues, some providing small quick-fixes (fluorescent light bulbs, hybrid cars, education for the poor to decrease birth rates, etc.), and some even completely denying their existence or relevance. All those beliefs born in 1789 are irrelevant to Aryanism.

Aryan economics must redefine economics as it must redefine the fundamentals of existence. This does not mean that the theories accumulated by economists should be ignored, but that the bad and irrelevant separated from the good. Aryan economics must shift towards centrally planned economies that are self-sufficient (German: autarkic) in order for large scale reforms, instead of the mere influence that governments have over market economies, to take place. And unless we wish to continue the present capitalist-socialist rivalry, class-rivalry and all its implications, reforms are required. Therefore, in order to redefine economics we must redefine its purpose, namely, the “fundamental economic problem”. The purpose of the economy must be redefined in an Aryan manner as to shift the focus from consumption and profit-obsession to a socially-based efficient economy.

Most people who were educated in the West are aware of the fundamentals of economics (supply and demand). Just as the economic problem must be redefined (and thus the purpose of economics), so must an economy’s basic functioning. Modern economists enjoy faith in the “invisible hand” and the relation between supply and demand. For a theory to be exercised, its fundamentals must be well-founded, and both the fundamentals of modern economics are filled with holes if not totally irrelevant.

Additionally, the tendency to dismiss economics as unimportant to an Aryan State is an illusion. Those who promote this and care not whether an Aryanist State operates by a barter-system or by fiat money, are not paying enough attention to the value of economics. Economics is undeniably linked with the social, cultural and political aspects of man. Failure to associate these factors with a functioning economy will cause an abrupt end to an Aryanist State. For the pragmatic, a functioning and powerful economy will be needed at the very least to arm the state for an inevitable war.

Initially, economic growth and full employment should be the main aims of an Aryanist state. A mostly self-sufficient economy (not an export economy) with imports coming only from allies or from close neighbours to avoid the impacts of a blockade during war. Most Aryanists will be aware of the barter trade system of Germany with its neighbours which will be pursued by a modern Aryanist State in order to keep money in the country in question as well as to stop the accumulation of debt. Also, reliable credit must be created for the expansion of the economy (particularly if the Aryanist State inherits an economy contracted by recession). This credit mustn’t come from overseas, particularly America, as that necessarily leads to foreign debt and subservience to the USA. Price and wage controls will be a necessity on at least the most basic goods to prevent inflation. As you can see, the policies will be different from those of all countries today, although slightly similar to those of centrally-planned Communist countries of the past.

As most Aryanist policies will differ before and after a war is fought, as will the economic policy. Leading up to the war a focus on production, particularly of armaments must be stressed more than it will be after this war. Furthermore, the state may have to enact policies that will be repealed after the war in order to increase production or any other war priority. However, if the war is pursued in its totality and is concluded with the defeat of hostile neighbours, the freedom to reform the state and its economy will present itself now that foreign threats are less drastic. Without doubt, the first to go will be those policies which were enacted reluctantly as preparation for war. Following this will likely go the stress of full employment over productivity growth. This must be pursued gradually and with caution in order not to cause structural unemployment. Similar services like the Reichsarbeitsdienst (RAD), while already created, may have to be expanded in order to offer retraining for those made redundant by the increase in productivity following further mechanisation of industry. At this moment, one will notice the need for demographic policies to reduce the population to suit the needs of the economy, which will likely follow from the reduction of inferior births.

This represents the technicalities of an Aryanist economics policy. Much has already been discussed about its philosophy which follow the themes of agrarianism, “beauty of work”, “strength through joy”, which require no revision but should be discussed later in more depth.

Police clashed in downtown Erzsébet tér on Saturday afternoon with a few hundred demonstrators who gathered to protest at Thursday’s court ruling dissolving the Magyar Gárda paramilitary group.

One of the 216 detained was Gábor Vona, head of the Gárda and its affiliated radical right-wing party Jobbik. He was released early Sunday morning. Most of those detained were released Saturday evening.

Politics.Hu

Hungary’s Jobbik (Movement for a Better Hungary) party won just under 15% of the votes in this year’s European election. Jobbik has a paramilitary group called the “Magyar Garda” (Hungarian Guard) which is more or less their Sturmabteilung.

Jobbik’s policies, philosophy, platform and methods are similar to those which should be used for an Aryanist Party. Therefore, the result of Jobbik and an Aryanist Party, particularly the reaction of the masses and the government, will also be similar. This arrest, for whatever reasons it was made, will necessarily be an example of the same problems an Aryanist party will face in Europe. For this reason, the progress of Jobbik and the Magyar Garda should be tracked and analysed to develop counter-strategies and for a more accurate measure of a government’s opposition to an Aryanist party.

Pentti Linkola has been introduced in the past few months to myself and others with whom I share environmentalist convictions. Linkola is a Finnish environmentalist who has a particular interest, and as his new book demonstrates, a limitless familiarity with Finland and its flora and fauna. While Linkola’s awareness does not reach far beyond Finland, the scope demonstrated in his book definitely does. Linkola’s views are radical and his works are definitely a reprieve from the contemporary environmentalists. Linkola’s new book, “Can Life Prevail?”, is worth-reading for all Aryanists as an introduction to the particulars of European and Finnish environmentalism as well as a sufficiently radical and total solution to this problem.

Can Life Prevail? Is one of the few environmentalist books I have read. It seems that in the many years Pentti Linkola has spent immersing himself in what he believes to be the proper, natural and most healthy life; that is, a life in constant contact with nature. It is immediately noticeable that Linkola is an idealist, which is most likely why his views are so extreme. Linkola recognises that Western culture and humans themselves are the problem. Linkola is a true radicalist and wishes to truly revolutionise the lifestyle of humans, not simply for sustainability and maximum exploitation, but for the ultimate health and happiness of all life. As a taste of Linkola’s beliefs, I will quote parts of the last section of the book.

A Demographic Plan

The cornerstone of any population platform is the dismantling of the freedom of procreation, the most senseless form of individual freedom. Puzzlingly, this policy has only been implemented so far in the country with the oldest culture of the world: China.
Procreation should be licensed: on average, every woman should be allowed to bear only one child. This policy should be followed for several generations, until a sustainable population is reached. The quality of the population must in all cases be taken into account as well: procreation licences would be denied to homes deemed genetically inadequate or unsuitable for the raising of children, whereas families capable of providing a stimulating environment for children would be granted several licences.

Energy

Fossil fuels, including peat, will be abolished on the first day the programme is implemented. Even the production and distribution of electricity – the harnessing of which should probably be seen as a great misfortune in the history of mankind – will largely be brought to an end. Electricity may continue to be used as a source of energy by the media and to illuminate rooms (strict quotas would have to be set in this case); but street lights and other external lighting would be banned. Households, as well as businesses, will have to switch to manual labour.
Other power plants will be demolished. The worst kind of plants, energy dams, will be the first to go. Indeed, the waterpower has caused the third great ecocatastrophe alongside the clearing of fields and the forest economy: the faltering of our whole marine economy. The new policy will restore our waters to their natural state.

The Collection of Carbon Dioxide

The only large-scale method of removing the colossal surplus of carbon that has already been released into the atmosphere is by absorbing it with vegetation: firstly with the trees, then with bushes. In Finland, the mean volume of living trees on growing forestland now amounts of 70 cubic metres per hectare. This figure will be increased to about 400 cubic metres per hectare, which corresponds to the natural density of forests. Additionally, a significant amount of carbon is stored in fallen trees: this increases the more north the woodland is and the slower the decomposition. It will take about one hundred years to reach the suggested figure of 400 cubic metres.
Still, in order to deliver orders and announcements to the population, to maintain the media and literary culture (all of which must be preserved in order to sustain society), the production of paper will continue.
Reforesting a significant portion of field acreage is the most notable step that will be taken.

Agriculture, Industry and Wares

Farming will be organised in small units, while machines will be abolished and a major portion of the population will be made to practise light agricultural work.
Industrial manufacturing will be subject to licensing: no product will be manufactured unless there is a buyer in real need of its use.
Most businesses will come to an end. Only a handful of large corporations will be maintained: for instance, those linked to the production of equipment used for public transportation, bicycles and paper. These industries will be in the hands of the state.

Education

The school system will be cherished as the most precious aspect of society. Foreign languages will be removed from the syllabus and less mathematics will be taught. The greatest emphasis will be placed on all-round education (natural sciences, history, Finnish), sports, arts and, most importantly, civic skills (which the adult population will also be taught).

I would suggest reading this book which is a compilation of articles written by Pentti Linkola over more than a decade. Visit his fansite for more information.

The free world, the democratic world, has long been known to be a fallacy and a disguise for American economic interests. With the re-election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the 2009 Iranian elections, the true nature of America and democracies around the world is shown without a doubt to be a form of patron-client relationship.

The world media reports that Ahmadinejad “apparently”, “reportedly”, even “allegedly”, has won the Iranian elections. Over the past few weeks the media has been, as always, promoting the “student movements” which generally call for the same ill-defined reforms and freedoms as well as, conveniently, friendly relations with America. Beyond the obvious links these movements have with the CIA, an interesting relationship reveals itself during the course of elections in the “less-than-free world”.

Despite Iran being a democracy, it is subject to the close-eye of American analysts and their lapdogs. It is America’s role to protect and further democracy which causes it to justify itself as the supreme dictator of which elections are legitimate, which parties and countries stand for freedom; and ultimately, which leaders will be elected. Despite Ahmadinejad’s re-election, the media in the west has doubted the legitimacy of his victory. Of course, this was an obvious outcome since, for weeks, the western media – in combination with presenting the reformists as the next leaders of Iran without a doubt – has stated plainly that if Ahmadinejad wins the election it is most likely due to vote rigging. Of course, the countries in which vote rigging actually occurs are almost always allies of America.

This role is the same with all democracies, but particularly democracies outside of “the West”. Democracies are the clients of the American patron and in return for the meagre returns of democracy and capitalism, the patrons promise a steady supply of these scraps for their clients. This relationship is deeply ingrained within the minds of the west after decades of American global hegemony and the acceptance and praise of this status-quo. For this reason, the West as a whole casts judgement on these democracies as if they were vassals of the free-world.

This can also be seen in the case of Palestine. America, and Israel alongside it, only support one party in any Palestinian elections. This party, like all parties supported by the free world, is entirely docile and a non-threat to these powers. Thus, whenever Hamas gains votes that circumstances are considered suspect, whether the claim is vote-fraud or intimidation.

No Aryanists are under the illusion of democracy, so this is not an attempt to sway anyone towards anti-democratic positions. This article is an articulation of the problem of democracy for non-Western countries primarily, but also all countries outside of America, Britain and Israel.

There are numerous confusions in the use of the term “Aryan”, particularly what an Aryan appearance is. Defining this with confidence will remove any confusions with interpretation of the Aryan phenotype as the same as a “White phenotype”.

In my opinion, there is not much improvement that must be made upon the theories of National Socialist Germany and other, unaffiliated, groups and individuals. Aryanist demographic policy, most importantly the policies which deal with selective breeding, should prefer those of “Nordid” phenotype. It is also my opinion that, at least initially, a wider range of “Aryans” should be included as acceptable for reproduction. However, the Nordid phenotype is, at the moment, the bearer of the most Aryan traits.

Any racial studies will have obvious negative drawbacks from difference in opinion to difference in interpretation. Identifying the phenotype that is most likely to coincide with higher prevalence of Aryan traits as well as the phenotype of the original Aryans is the main aim of any racial study on an Aryanist basis. To avoid the likely bickering over the technicalities of classification and trivialities that will not matter for the Aryanist movement but will be a concern for an Aryanist state, a range of Nordids should be considered acceptable.

For an emerging Aryanist movement, phenotype should play a role. We should understand the basics of what the desired phenotype is and analyse applicants generally with little regard to excluding periphery types. This way, contradictions which will inevitably occur from even professional classifications will not occur. A lenient classifications, with non-Nordid admixtures should be allowed as long as there are no compounding factors in either phenotype, ancestry or personal record (e.g. Jewish ancestry or criminal record).

For an Aryanist state, it would be best to prioritise research on phenotype as well as a genotype for correlations between Aryan traits and any manifestations mentally and physically. Until then, relying on internet research and the small number of studies done each year, is pointless. We do not have the resources, nor do we really require the needs, to research either Aryan phenotype or genotype.

The main traits that should be preferred are:

• Dolichocephalism
• Ectomorphism
• Defined jaw, chin and nose
• Bridged and long nose
• Relatively straight profile

Below are some of the better examples of the “Nordid” phenotype by the artist Wolfgang Willrich.

Many seem to be focusing on the BNP for the upcoming elections in Britain and the party’s faults with their platform, ideology and leadership. This will be an article regarding what I believe is the unsurprising result of British culture, history and its people.

When one looks at Britain, one sees many similarities with America. Both are “exceptionalist”, in that, they believe that they are exceptions to the rules governing everything else. They both consider themselves to be great powers, as nations which will be remembered, and will continue to be great, until the end of time due to their endless contributions to humanity. And both were formed upon abstract and undefined concepts in a manner which constantly reaffirms their own morality and just-cause. After making these observations, one should note that they are all characteristics of a thoroughly Tribalist spirit.

Britain’s history should prove sufficiently that:

1. Britons are an amalgamation of several racial groups, resulting in a non-Aryan populous that has been suppressed by Anglo-Saxon rulers
2. Britain is spiritually deprived due to its confused soul
3. Britain has only ever used its power to damage the rest of Europe

These points should force the conclusion that Britain, like it has from its inception, is a barrier to Aryandom and Aryanism itself. It will always oppose Aryanism because, to exist, it must. It has proven this time and time again. Most importantly, for Aryanists, we should not let our idealism cause us to misplace our faith and altruism in Britain’s friendship.

The British National Party, and the White Nationalism upon which it is based, is the political descendant of this bastardised country. I doubt that the BNP will be successful in anything more than increasing their votes marginally. However, the BNP is the closest Britain will ever get to Aryanism. This is no reason to support the BNP. It is the reason to ignore Britain in our political motives – Britain is lost, in fact, Aryanism never even had a hold on that “green and pleasant land”.

Regarding the BNP’s mainstream aspirations, all that needs to be said is that they wish to replace the immigrants with themselves as the sole subjects of their Jewish masters. The BNP is a “Revolt”, as defined on the Network page. The BNP, and indeed the British people, do not care about the direction of their country, only the means of accomplishing it; for they know, their country does not have any direction beyond its self-fulfilling promises of “freedom”, “justice”, etc..

Put bluntly, Britain should not be the focus of our attentions. When the time comes, and indeed it will, Britain must simply be crushed without any illusions of possible friendship.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f8lprxiOFc&fmt=18&w=505&h=310&rel=0

Election Results

The results are as I had suspected. The British National Party took 2 seats with 6.5% in the European Elections. Interestingly, only 14 million people of a 40 million electorate voted – a sign of British fatalism regarding their power and influence over politics. This is also perhaps the main reason for the increase in the BNP’s popularity. The growing discontent and helplessness amongst the British electorate, as well as the latest scandal involing the expenses of MPs has been capitalised upon by the BNP. This boost is thus rather small and will, I suspect, be temporary. Unless the BNP receives even larger – and thus blatantly obvious – support it will not increase its popularity in the next elections.

The results can be viewed on the BBC’s website.

The results for all the countries in the 2004 and 2009 European elections can also be viewed on the BBC’s website.

The problem of scapegoating is important to how we view ourselves and our enemy and is itself detrimental to Aryanism. Scapegoating Jews, or anyone other group, is the result of a partial or complete denial of the fallibility of Gentiles. Aryanists should easily be capable of discerning between what is the result of the Jews and what is the result of ourselves.

Many of us will have experiences to draw from where scapegoating has been the cause of some obscene claims. When anti-Jewish websites attempt to write articles on certain periods of history, or certain groups from history, nearly all blame the smallest of perceived discrepancies on nothing short of total Jewish control of the subject-matter. Examples I have come across are too numerous to fully list. The most notable are claims that “Jewish banksters” caused the Dark Ages through contraction of the money supply. This is simply, again, confusion between actual Jewish power and Gentile fallibility. Some find it almost inconceivable that the world would not be perfect if the Jew no longer had any power; and, subsequently, blames any part of history that is not of sufficient quality, in whatever form and by whatever subjective means, to be thoroughly Jewish. Others that are more well-known include: the purported Jewish ancestry of nearly every historical figure; the Jewish origins of many of the modern institutions (Vatican, Banks, etc.); and the long list of perceived Jewish ideas and concepts. This is nothing more than the result of burdening the fools of the anti-Jewish movement with too much knowledge and a shortage of wisdom.

The material relationship between Jews and Aryans is one of parasitism. However, the spiritual relationship; the relationship which is most evident throughout history, is a separate phenomenon. While the Jews themselves have been quite successful in their destruction of; first the Aryan, and then the Gentile spirit, the problem that is the essence of their success that has existed long before the two groups had any contact of note, is the Aryan himself. It has been said before, but without the necessary emphasis. While the Jews have cleverly exploited Gentile weaknesses, it is not unthinkable that even without the existence of the Jews, Gentiles would follow a similar path. For this reason, it should be evident that most of history is not the result of the plotting of some clever Jews, but in-group fallibility. Every Aryan civilisation has caused its own degradation. In this way, the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade should not be viewed any differently to the Slave trades of Rome, nor should any figure or period with negative connotations be blamed on the influence of the Jews.

The core of this scapegoating problem is, as stated above, a problem of the inclusion of the insufficiently intelligent within the intellectual ranks of this anti-Jewish movement. For the Aryanist movement, we should aim for action and not moribund, relentless; and worst of all, pointless, pseudo-inquiry and rejection of actual authority. This is required, for the reason the unintelligent are included amongst the intellectuals is primarily because there is nothing to do in the anti-Jewish movement but speculate on this or that historical or contemporary person, era or idea. This is opposed to any group which supports the concept of a victory by informing, that “we” will be victorious simply by “awakening the masses” through ceaseless flooding of pseudo-intellectual and historical information. While information is definitely important in swaying the masses, it is only information in small doses; and preferably with proportionately high emotional content, that is necessary. This way, the prevention of the unintelligent from contradicting the intellectuals; and because of their numbers, overwhelming them, becomes as simple as restricting our propaganda efforts to a generalised and condensed format.

However, there are also a number of causes which pollute the propaganda and beliefs of those intelligent enough to be involved with the intellectuals. I think the fundamental issue is a lack of respect and a lack of thought. The majority of the anti-Jewish movement is composed of Americans who were born after the 1970s. As is stereotypically the case, they lack both respect and thought and indulge in their opposites. None are too afraid to accuse a certain person of historical value of being a Jew after only an hour of research. Similarly, many are under the illusion that their opinions, based on typically immature insights, opinions and a lack of wisdom, are actually of substance. Perhaps one of the reasons the anti-Jewish movement is having so much trouble is precisely because of this. For those in the past lacked the degree of, and in some cases any, historical precedence – at least that they were aware of – that proved their beliefs. Even in the case of National Socialist Germany, many may notice that certain members of the Elite were comparatively un-educated on the “Jewish Problem”. Despite this, the National Socialists were completely capable of forming proper policy and establishing an “official line” on the subject. While we are far more informed, we lack any wisdom. Instead of thinking, we give our opinions. Instead of analysing, we wait for someone else to do so, in order to reproduce the same analysis with alterations fitting our own opinions. All in all, this is the result of the badly parented younger generations who have been nurtured to the point of a collective egotistical narcissism.

An enormous amount of collective dysfunction are part of this problem, but I believe the above are the most detrimental. While they do not yet effect Aryanism, they will with its expansion. For this reason, we must target the right groups with our propaganda and our members must be able to follow without fully understanding the situation. We must entice the Elite with Aryanist spirit and the masses with a party platform. All in all, if we are able to create loyalty, we will be able to successfully create a mainstream movement which does not suffer from the usual side-effects of division, factionalism and fragility.

There is a distinct difference between modern environmentalism and Aryan environmentalism. The difference stems from the differing attitudes between non-Aryan and Aryan in regards to problems of such magnitude. This difference is fundamentally a difference between revolt and revolution. Aryan Sanctuary defined these two and I have added this to the Network page for a common vocabulary.

The modern and popular conception of environmentalism takes the form of a revolt due to the decisions made, perhaps unintentionally, during its inception as a movement. Modern environmentalism opted for a populist, rather than an elitist structure. This ensured quick success and growing sympathy and support; towards which the widespread, at least partial, understanding of environmentalism is to be credited. However, to achieve this popularity, modern environmentalism sacrificed dedication and a degree of activism (the current activists are perpetually becoming proportionately smaller relative to sympathisers) as well as its originally “Radicalist” basis. Again, I am using Aryan Sanctuary’s definition of “Radicalism”, which is listed on the Network page. The sacrifice of its originally Aryan aspects (create mankind anew instead of developing more efficient energy solutions which only feed the problem) for popular support has resulted in its adoption of a form of activism categorised as “revolt”.

Environmentalism which is solely materialist can only be categorised as a “revolt”, populist and ultimately non-Aryan. A fine example of this is the popular term: “sustainability”. In other words, the most efficient exploitation of natural resources; with the least consequences, for the sole purpose of satisfying man’s narcissistic pleasures. This is only a revision of the current attitude towards the environment, typified by American society. It is only a revision due to the pragmatic need to increase efficiency and not to reduce consumption; but to satisfy the compounding desires of the rapidly expanding masses. Therefore, it can be seen that; as the term revolt is defined, so is modern environmentalism, “dissatisfaction with the consequences of presently popular thought”. Ultimately, non-Aryan environmentalism only exists in order to satisfy human desires as much as possible, for the longest period of time. Side-effects of this ideology are the half-measures, such as fluorescent light-bulbs and hybrid cars which only lessen the negative impact on the environment for fear of disrupting the masses in their march to oblivion via excessive consumption.

Aryan environmentalism is a total approach to our current environmental problems. The “totality” of Aryan environmentalism must be stressed. Aryan environmentalism is one aspect of an Aryan society which relies on all the others to function in a distinctly Aryan manner. While Aryan environmentalists will continue with the current research into alternative energies and other material solutions to many of the current problems (at a faster rate), an Aryan environmental policy will be free to solve the prime cause of our current problems and prevent the same from reoccurring. Without the Demographic, scientific and foreign policies of Aryanism, the environment can never be restored to its proper functionality. For this reason, unlike modern environmentalists, we must be able to pursue our ends through the acquisition of government powers.

Key to Aryan environmentalism is solving consumption. While non-Aryan environmentalists, like their economic cousins, never seek to solve the problem of consumption and the economic problem respectively, Aryanism must solve both. Instead of quenching the appetite of both (exponential growth in consumption), an Aryanist society will restrict consumption through proper education and a cut in the supply of excessive and undesirable goods and services. Of course, population reduction will also play an important part in reducing consumption.

An Aryanist government would also have the powers and means to convince the public of its large spending on conservation, creating national reserves, habitat restoration, resettlement of human population, etc., and any discontent it may cause.
Therefore, Aryanism should actively engage in the green, environmentalist and other such movements and their discussions. The current environmentalists, those of pure heart and genuine sincerity, will be easily assimilated into our movement.

Each movement, organisation and political party that relies on discipline and unity to achieves its goals must have a Code of Conduct. Codes that are lenient are used to create an image for this organisation. Codes that a strict and well-defined are used to deter potential members who did not have the desired character, as well as to establish a bond between members. Lenient Codes may simply be what to say and what not to say in public, while disciplined Codes may be as authoritarian as establishing diets, fasting periods, phenotype and physical health, formal education, combined with a general assessment of “spirit”. For Aryanism, the Code of any movement, organisation, group or order should lean towards the disciplined latter.

This is intended to be an open debate and should be interpreted as the foundations for any Aryanist organisation. An open debate will ensure that key requirements are not missed and useless requirements not included. It should also be noted that for an increase in quantity, increased leniency and decreased quality will result. The Code stipulated herein will be that of the “Elite” referred to in previous articles.

Body

• Limited or no animal product consumption
• BMI in healthy range
• No addictive consumption of any substance
• No tattoos

Genotype & Phenotype

• No more than 1/64 Jewish ancestry (maternal or paternal)
• No obvious phenotypically Jewish features
• No major or debilitating physical defects
• No major diseases or disorders
• At least 5’8”

Character

• Idealistic
• Educated on Aryanism
• Self-Disciplined
• Initiative and creativity
• Potential to lead and follow
• No sexual promiscuity, perversion or degeneracy

Record

• Good financial history and absence of large debts
• Good employment and criminal record
• No members of any enemy organisations

There are some requirements that I have left out since I am not sure whether they will be too strict. I thought that perhaps a point system may work better, where each requirement has a set point value. Each requirement fulfilled forms a final score and the applicant is graded on that.

I hope that others can contribute to this concept and list.